Trending...
- SacraPod Suites Unveils AI-Powered 'Work + Rest' Smart Hospitality Model for Retrofitting Underused Motels Across the U.S
- From Real Estate to Reel Power: H.L Woods Carves His Legacy as a Cutting-Edge Visionary Filmmaker
- Heritage at South Brunswick Offers Immediate Townhome Appointments and Special Mortgage Incentive Fast-Moving Sales
SILVER SPRING, Md. - Marylandian -- In a decision that will not only affect his Client, Jason Mount, on August 29, 2019, a three-judge panel for the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, issued an opinion, Mount v. DHS, 18-1762, that will effectively change the manner in which whistleblower claims are decided by Merit Systems Protection Board ("MSPB"), Administrative Judges ("AJ"). Mr. Mount had sought MSPB protection for his Individual Right of Action under the Whistleblower Protection Act ("WPA"), claiming that because he delivered an envelope containing an email that assisted another Immigration and Customs Enforcement ("ICE") whistleblower, the Agency retaliated against him by denying him promotions and reducing his job evaluation. The MSPB AJ dismissed Mount's case, contending that his actions did not amount to actually assisting another whistleblower, in that he was no more than a delivery person, similar to a Fed-Ex messenger. As such, his whistleblower participation was not meaningful or protected.
However, Mount also argued that even if he did not actually provide whistleblower assistance, his superiors perceived that he had done so, evidenced by their investigation on that activity. The MSPB AJ dismissed Mount's perceived whistleblower claim because he did not exhaust that claim before the Office of Special Counsel ("OSC") prior to filing with the MSPB, as Mount never officially made a "perceived whistleblower claim" on his OSC charge. The First Circuit Court of Appeals called the MSPB AJ's application of the exhausting requirement "hyper-technical" and viewed it as an impediment to the overall purpose of the WPA and its legislative history. The Court reasoned that Mount's allegations as written in the OSC charge supported the core element of his perceived whistleblower claim: "that agency officials appeared to believe that [he] engaged… in whistleblowing activity." The Court cited numerous instances where Mount had made detailed contentions on his OSC charge supporting a perceived whistleblower claim.
More on Marylandian
The opinion is groundbreaking in several respects. First, it levels the playing field for Federal employees who file whistleblower claims with the OSC, as nowhere on the OSC form does the term, "perceived whistleblower" appear. Hence, as Mr. Fischer argued, no Federal employee would have notice of a requirement to use the term, "perceived whistleblower." Second, the Court indirectly expanded the perceived whistleblower doctrine to federal employees who make whistleblower disclosures that may not necessarily comply with the strict and narrow definitions of illegality, fraud, waste, and abuse. At the oral argument, the U.S. Attorney argued that a perceived whistleblower claim should be limited to cases where agency officials mistakenly believed that the retaliated whistleblower made a disclosure, when in fact he didn't. The Court soundly rejected that argument.
The manner in which MSPB AJs rule on Federal Whistleblower claims will also be improved for the Federal employee. Whistleblower claims involve 3 elements: (1) the employee must prove by preponderance of evidence that he/she made a disclosure; (2) the employee must prove by preponderance of evidence that the disclosure was a contributing factor to the adverse action against him/her; and (3) the Federal Agency must prove by clear and convincing evidence that it would have taken the same action against the employee, even without his/her disclosure. Typically, MSPB Ajs rule against the Federal employee on the first element, due to the employee not meeting the strict definition of an actual whistleblower disclosure and/or the employee failing to exhaust his perceived whistleblower claim. As a result, the Ajs never do any analysis on the conduct of the Federal Agent who retaliated against the Federal employee. The Mount decision effectively curtails many dismissals on the perceived whistleblower theory.
More on Marylandian
The Appeal was argued in Boston, Massachusetts by Morris E. Fischer, Esq. on April 1, 2019. Mr. Fischer has successfully handled several national, high-profile cases against ICE, including a sexual harassment claim by James T. Hayes, Jr., against Janet Napolitano's Chief of Staff which made national news and Taylor Johnson, who testified before the United States Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Oversight in reporting that the head of a wealthy investor group, Rory Reid, son of then-Senate Minority leader, Harry Reid, pressured Department of Homeland Security officials to unlawfully expedite EB-5 visa applications.
http://www.morrisfischerlaw.com
http://www.morrisfischerlaw.com/videos/perceived-whistleblower/
However, Mount also argued that even if he did not actually provide whistleblower assistance, his superiors perceived that he had done so, evidenced by their investigation on that activity. The MSPB AJ dismissed Mount's perceived whistleblower claim because he did not exhaust that claim before the Office of Special Counsel ("OSC") prior to filing with the MSPB, as Mount never officially made a "perceived whistleblower claim" on his OSC charge. The First Circuit Court of Appeals called the MSPB AJ's application of the exhausting requirement "hyper-technical" and viewed it as an impediment to the overall purpose of the WPA and its legislative history. The Court reasoned that Mount's allegations as written in the OSC charge supported the core element of his perceived whistleblower claim: "that agency officials appeared to believe that [he] engaged… in whistleblowing activity." The Court cited numerous instances where Mount had made detailed contentions on his OSC charge supporting a perceived whistleblower claim.
More on Marylandian
- Maryland Horse Industry Board Meeting Notice
- Smart Resnse Unveils Smart Resnse(SRMS) Token-Powered AI Orchestration Platform to Revolutionize Multi-Billion Dollar Market
- Josh and Heidi Follow Up the Much Anticipated and Successful Launch of the "Spreading the Good BUZZ" Podcast with a Personal Request
- Local Filmmaker Brings Folklore and Film to Her Own Backyard in Silver Spring
- Revolutionary Blockchain Platform Okh Finance Announces Okh Finance(OKKH) Token Launch to Transform Global Asset Leasing Market
The opinion is groundbreaking in several respects. First, it levels the playing field for Federal employees who file whistleblower claims with the OSC, as nowhere on the OSC form does the term, "perceived whistleblower" appear. Hence, as Mr. Fischer argued, no Federal employee would have notice of a requirement to use the term, "perceived whistleblower." Second, the Court indirectly expanded the perceived whistleblower doctrine to federal employees who make whistleblower disclosures that may not necessarily comply with the strict and narrow definitions of illegality, fraud, waste, and abuse. At the oral argument, the U.S. Attorney argued that a perceived whistleblower claim should be limited to cases where agency officials mistakenly believed that the retaliated whistleblower made a disclosure, when in fact he didn't. The Court soundly rejected that argument.
The manner in which MSPB AJs rule on Federal Whistleblower claims will also be improved for the Federal employee. Whistleblower claims involve 3 elements: (1) the employee must prove by preponderance of evidence that he/she made a disclosure; (2) the employee must prove by preponderance of evidence that the disclosure was a contributing factor to the adverse action against him/her; and (3) the Federal Agency must prove by clear and convincing evidence that it would have taken the same action against the employee, even without his/her disclosure. Typically, MSPB Ajs rule against the Federal employee on the first element, due to the employee not meeting the strict definition of an actual whistleblower disclosure and/or the employee failing to exhaust his perceived whistleblower claim. As a result, the Ajs never do any analysis on the conduct of the Federal Agent who retaliated against the Federal employee. The Mount decision effectively curtails many dismissals on the perceived whistleblower theory.
More on Marylandian
- Cover Girl Finalist Teisha Mechetti Questions Legitimacy of Inked Originals Competition, Demands Transparency
- Easton & Easton, LLP Files Suit Against The Dwelling Place Anaheim & Vineyard USA Over Abuse Allegations
- AI Visibility: The Key to Beating Google's AI Overviews and Regaining Traffic
- Stuck Doing Math or Figuring Out Life's Numbers? Calculator.now Makes It Stupidly Simple
- Colbert Packaging Announces WBENC Recognition
The Appeal was argued in Boston, Massachusetts by Morris E. Fischer, Esq. on April 1, 2019. Mr. Fischer has successfully handled several national, high-profile cases against ICE, including a sexual harassment claim by James T. Hayes, Jr., against Janet Napolitano's Chief of Staff which made national news and Taylor Johnson, who testified before the United States Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Oversight in reporting that the head of a wealthy investor group, Rory Reid, son of then-Senate Minority leader, Harry Reid, pressured Department of Homeland Security officials to unlawfully expedite EB-5 visa applications.
http://www.morrisfischerlaw.com
http://www.morrisfischerlaw.com/videos/perceived-whistleblower/
Source: Morris E. Fischer, LLC
0 Comments
Latest on Marylandian
- NASA Collaborative Agreement for Supply of Thin-Film Solar Tech for Orbital Application to Advance Development of Thin-Film PV Power Beaming: $ASTI
- Exciting New Era of Sports, Entertainment & Gaming Innovation Spotlighted by Rebrand of Expanding AI Driven, Online Fan Engagement Company: SEGG Media
- VFAF MD State Chapter Joins Texas Flood Relief Ops said Stan Fitzgerald Veterans for America First
- Service Ninjas Debuts First-of-Its-Kind "Membership" Platform for Home Service Pros
- Bruce In The USA Brings Immersive Bruce Springsteen Celebration to Frederick This October
- BIYA Forecasts 2025 Surge with ¥300M ($41.8 M USD) in Revenue and ¥25M Profit from Cloud Based HR Solutions: Baiya Intl. Group (N A S D A Q: BIYA)
- Paul E. Saperstein Co. Announces Geographic Expansion of Auction Services
- Florida Broker Bent Danholm Featured in the Daily Mail's U.S. Real Estate Coverage
- Robin Launches Legal Intelligence Platform to solve intelligence gap in Fortune 500 legal teams
- Melissa B. Releases Digitally Independent: Empowering Music Artists with AI and Brand Strategy
- Consumer Accountability Alliance Issues Formal Notice Alleging Proximate Liability for Medical Harm
- Utah Metal Fabricator Titan Forge Builds Momentum with Custom Steel Projects and Spiral Staircases
- Jason Koch: Pioneering the Future of Real Estate Development in New Jersey
- Bach and Beyond: Cellists Return to the Beach for 2nd Annual Bethany Beach Cellofest
- NR7 Miner launches zero-cost USDT cloud mining service: daily stable income + referral rewards for double profit
- Deaths Spur Closures, but Troubled Teen Camps Must Be Banned, CCHR Warns
- Palmer Lake Wine Festival To Build Bridges in Small Mountain Community, Highlight Local Businesses
- SacraPod Suites Unveils AI-Powered 'Work + Rest' Smart Hospitality Model for Retrofitting Underused Motels Across the U.S
- From Real Estate to Reel Power: H.L Woods Carves His Legacy as a Cutting-Edge Visionary Filmmaker
- New Release: 'The Invisible Alternative' Unveiled by Atrisk Corporation, Resilient