MIAMI - Marylandian -- The Center for Life Insurance Disputes recently represented the widow of a Florida dentist in a $5 million life insurance claim dispute. The widow tried to file a claim for the death benefits of a life insurance policy upon her husband's death but was told by the insurer the policy had lapsed two months before his death.

The life insurance was intended to take care of her financial needs after his death. It appeared there would be nothing for her. She was devastated.

The widow retained the Center for Life Insurance Disputes (the Center) to investigate and establish if she had a valid claim.

From their claim investigation the Center found that the insurer had been providing the husband with incorrect policy information for at least 2 years before the policy lapsed. It also uncovered that the insurer had sent more than one set of premium notices that showed different amounts owed at about the same time. And finally, the Center determined that the insurer was managing the policy under the rules and regulations of the wrong state.

More on Marylandian

• How Dance Helped Famed Choreographer Joey L. Dowdy Overcome Adversity and Triumph on The Dancefloor!
• Assemblywoman Rosy Bagolie (D-LD27 Essex/Passaic) Launches Powerful Reelection Campaign Video
• Career Communications Group Launches Two New General Interest Magazines for 2025–2026
• Ezhong At CIMT 2025 In Beijing!
• Mediterranean Estate Sells for Record $1.93M in Gotha's Braemar Community

One especially critical policy management violation by the insurer was that the insured was being mailed policy status statements quarterly and annually but the information didn't match when it should have. The policy information on the last day of the year should have been the same on both the Quarterly Statement and the Annual Statement – it wasn't.

The Center argued that these errors caused the policy to lapse, not the policyowner.

Life insurance companies are obligated to provide accurate and reliable information to their policyholders. The information an insurer provides -- especially for universal life insurance and whole life policies -- sets the foundation for how a policyowner can keep their policy in good standing. When the information is faulty so too will be the owner's efforts to pay enough premium.

The Center presented their findings to the life insurance company and it was met with skepticism and pushback. The insurer bellowed that their systems were reliable. Their aggressive stance didn't deter the Center, which knew the facts would prove them correct. After several rounds of document sharing and arguments the insurer conceded by paying the claim -- but not admitting any wrongdoing.

More on Marylandian

• AFOP's National Long-Sleeve Shirt Drive
• Talentica Software Recognizes Top Innovators in Its Multi-Agent Hackathon
• Guests Can Save 15 Percent on a Florida Keys Vacation Home Rental with KeysCaribbean's 'Advance Purchase Discount'
• Elevate Local Launches to Help Tennessee Small Businesses Grow Online with Expert SEO and Digital Marketing
• Olga Torres Once Again Recognized as a Top Advisor by Foreign Investment Watch

This was not just a violation of a single policy and its effect on a beneficiary. The mismanagement of the policy by the insurer affected everyone whose policy was being managed by the same computer system and practices.

The widow received her $5 million life insurance claim payment.